Arquivos de Asma, Alergia e Imunologia
https://aaai-asbai.org.br/article/doi/10.5935/2526-5393.20230073
Arquivos de Asma, Alergia e Imunologia
Artigo de Revisão

Síndrome da urticária de contato – uma revisão

Contact urticaria syndrome - a review

Sérgio Duarte Dortas Junior; Solange Oliveira Rodrigues Valle

Downloads: 0
Views: 14

Resumo

A síndrome da urticária de contato (SUC), a urticária de contato (UCO) e a dermatite de contato por proteínas (DCP) são entidades descritas sob o rótulo de reações cutâneas imediatas por contato. Geralmente as urticas surgem 20-30 minutos após a exposição por contato com uma substância, e desaparecem por completo em algumas horas, sem deixar lesão residual. Entretanto, a SUC pode apresentar sintomas generalizados graves. Estima-se uma prevalência, entre trabalhadores europeus, entre 5-10%, enquanto na população geral estima-se de que seja de 1-3%. Os mecanismos envolvidos na patogênese da SUC não foram totalmente elucidados. Uma abordagem inicial, para melhorar a sua compreensão, pode ser dividir esta condição em urticária não imunológica (UCNI) e imunológica (UCI). A primeira não necessita de sensibilização prévia ao alérgeno, enquanto a segunda necessita. O diagnóstico da SUC necessita de uma anamnese detalhada e exame físico seguido de teste cutâneo com as substâncias suspeitas. O afastamento do agente desencadeante é o melhor tratamento. Para isso é necessário o diagnóstico apropriado e precoce, a confecção de relatórios ocupacionais e o desenvolvimento de medidas preventivas.

Palavras-chave

Urticária crônica, urticária crônica induzida, angioedema, dermatite, dermatite ocupacional.

Abstract

Contact urticaria syndrome (CUS), contact urticaria, and protein contact dermatitis (PCD) are entities described under the umbrella term of immediate contact skin reactions (ICSR). Generally, hives appear 20-30 minutes after contact with the offending substance, and disappear completely in a few hours, without leaving residual lesions. However, the CUS may be associated with severe systemic symptoms. A prevalence of 5-10% has been estimated among European workers; in the general population it is 1-3%. The mechanisms involved in CUS pathogenesis have not been fully elucidated. An initial approach to improving its understanding involves dividing this condition into non-immune and immune contact urticaria. The former does not require prior sensitization to the allergen, while the latter does. Diagnosis of CUS is established by a detailed history and physical examination, followed by skin tests with suspected substances. Removal of the triggering agent is the best treatment. This requires early proper diagnosis, occupational reporting, and development of preventive measures.

Keywords

Chronic urticaria, chronic inducible urticaria, angioedema, dermatitis, occupational dermatitis.

Referências

1. Gimenez-Arnau A, Maurer M, De La Cuadra J, Maibach H. Immediate contact skin reactions, an update of Contact Urticaria, Contact Urticaria Syndrome and Protein Contact Dermatitis - "A Never Ending Story". Eur J Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;20(5):552-62.

2. Maibach HI, Johnson HL. Contact urticaria syndrome. Contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide (immediate-type hypersensitivity). Arch Dermatol. 1975 Jun;111(6):726-30.

3. Maibach H. Contact urticaria syndrome [Letter]. JAMA. 1976 Apr 26;235(17):1842.

4. Giménez-Arnau AM, Pesqué D, Maibach HI. Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022;11(4):194-201.

5. Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J. Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis. 1976 Feb;2(1):28-42.

6. Vester L, Thyssen JP, Menné T, Johansen JD. Consequences of occupational food-related hand dermatoses with a focus on protein contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:328-33.

7. Gimenez-Arnau AM, Maibach H. Contact Urticaria. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2021;41:467-80.

8. Pesonen M, Koskela K, Aalto-Korte K. Contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases in a period of 12 years. Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Jul;83(1):1-7.

9. Williams JD, Lee AY, Matheson MC, Frowen KE, Noonan AM, Nixon RL. Occupational contact urticaria: Australian data. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:125-31.

10. Süß H, Dölle-Bierke S, Geier J, Kreft B, Oppel E, Pföhler C, et al. Contact urticaria: Frequency, elicitors and cofactors in three cohorts (Information Network of Departments of Dermatology; Network of Anaphylaxis; and Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany). Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Nov;81(5):341-53.

11. Yeo L, Debusscher C, White JML. Occupational contact urticaria to cannabis sativa. Occup Med (Lond). 2022 May 23;72(4):273-5.

12. Hannuksela M. Mechanisms in contact urticaria. Clin Dermatol. 1997 Jul-Aug;15(4):619-22.

13. Cox AL, Eigenmann PA, Sicherer SH. Clinical relevance of cross-reactivity in food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9:82-99.

14. Haltia T, Jungewelter S, Airaksinen L, Suomela S, Lindström I, Suojalehto H. Occupational asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria from indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) hair dye. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Sep;9(9):3500-2.

15. Helaskoski E, Suojalehto H, Virtanen H, Airaksinen L, Kuuliala O, Aalto-Korte K, et al. Occupational asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria caused by oxidative hair dyes in hairdressers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Jan;112(1):46-52.

16. Wilkinson M, Solman L, Coenraads PJ, Goebel C. Immediate hypersensitivity to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Mar;80(3):177-8.

17. Hiller J, Greiner A, Drexler H. Respiratory afflictions during hairdressing jobs: case history and clinical evaluation of a large symptomatic case series. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2022 May 23;17(1):10.

18. Amaro C, Goossens A. Immunological occupational contact urticaria and contact dermatitis from proteins: a review. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58:67-75.

19. Andersen KE, Maibach HI. Multiple application delayed onset contact urticaria: possible relation to certain unusual formalin and textile reactions? Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10:227-34.

20. Vieira FM, Neto ACP, Ferreira EN, Tumelero M, Filho NAR. Síndrome de alergia pólen-alimento no Brasil. Arq Asma Alerg Imunol. 2018;2(1):153-4.

21. Amin S, Tanglertsampan C, Maibach HI. Contact urticaria syndrome: 1997. Am J Contact Dermat. 1997 Mar;8(1):15-9.

22. Palosuo T, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S, Alenius H, Reunala T, Yip E, Turjanmaa K. Measurement of natural rubber latex allergen levels in medical gloves by allergen-specific IgE-ELISA inhibition, RAST inhibition, and skin prick test. Allergy. 1998;53:59-67.

23. França AT, Dortas Junior SD. Urticária de Contato/Ocupacional. In: França AT, Valle SOR. Urticária e Angioedema - Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2014.

24. Walter A, Seegräber M, Wollenberg A. Food-related contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, and atopy patch test with food. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:19-31.

25. Nishiwaki K, Matsumoto Y, Kishida K, Kaku M, Tsuboi R, Okubo Y. A case of contact dermatitis and contact urticaria syndrome due to multiple allergens observed in a professional baseball player. Allergol Int. 2018;67:417-8.

26. Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, Aquilina S, Asero R, Baker D, et al. The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/ APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):734-66.


Submetido em:
20/03/2024

Aceito em:
24/03/2024

69f8bb5ba953956b760fc39a aaai Articles
Links & Downloads

Arq Asma Alerg Imunol

Share this page
Page Sections